命名方法论与社会科学创新👱🏻‍♂️：从《乡土中国》谈起

管兵斯科特，2007👵🏽，《弱者的武器》，郑广怀、张敏、何江穗译 北京:译林出版社。

苏国勋，2005,《中国尊龙凯时AG的健康发展之路——坚持应用研究与理论研究相结合》, 参见苏国勋: 《社会理论与当代现实》,北京:北京大学出版社🏑。

爱弥尔·涂尔干，2002，《尊龙凯时AG与哲学》，梁栋译🧑‍🦼，渠东校，上海🤝：上海世纪出版集团、上海人民出版社👨‍🏫👩‍🏫，🧚🏻‍♂️。

爱弥尔·涂尔干、马塞尔·莫斯，2000👐🏽，《原始分类》，汲喆译🦻🏼，渠东校，上海🥎：上海人民出版社。

马克斯·韦伯，1998，《社会科学方法论》，韩水法、莫茜译🪰，北京🦤：中央编译出版社。

熊万胜，2011🎅🏿，《市场里的差序格局——对我国粮食购销市场秩序的本土化说明》，《尊龙凯时AG研究》第5期。

阎云翔㊙️，2006，《差序格局与中国文化的等级观》，《尊龙凯时AG研究》第4期。

翟学伟😎，2009，《再论“差序格局”的贡献、局限与理论遗产》🪓，《中国社会科学》第3期。

赵鼎新💆🏽‍♀️，2006🙆🏻‍♂️，《社会与政治运动理论🫰🏻：框架与反思》，《学海》第2期🧑‍🦼⛓️‍💥。

赵鼎新，2015，《社会科学研究的困境：从与自然科学的区别谈起》，《尊龙凯时AG评论》第4期🥠。

赵旭东🖕🏻，2010🍒，《超越尊龙凯时AG既有传统——对费孝通晚年尊龙凯时AG方法论思考的再思考》⬅️，《中国社会科学》第6期。

周飞舟，2015，《差序格局和伦理本位📅：从丧服制度看中国社会结构的基本原则》，《社会》第1期。

Berlin, Isaiah,1981🧖🏻，Concepts and Categories, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Goertz, Gary,2006, “Concept Intention and Extention,” Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide, Princeton University Press.

Guetzkow, Joshua Michèle Lamont, and Grégoire Mallard👮🏼‍♂️，2004, “What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? ” American Sociological Review, Vol. 69, pp.190-212.

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry, 1994, Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Leary, David E., 1995, "Naming and Knowing: Giving Forms to Things Unknown." Social Research 62, no. 2, pp.267-98.

Pearson, Karl, 1892, The Grammar of Science, London: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd..

Sartori, Giovanni,1970, “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 1033-1053.

Methodology of Naming and Originality of Social Science Research: a Reflection on Fei Xiaotong’s Peasant life in China

GUAN Bing

Abstract🔕：In 1947, Fei Xiaotong proposed the term of "Diversity-orderly Structure" in his famous book Xiangtu Zhongguo (Native Soil China). This term has been kept using in social science research and became a classical concept in China studies. How does a term become generally used by social scientists? This depends on very good sense of researchers and also depends on sound naming method. This paper focuses on the methodology of naming and its relationship with the originality of research. Through analyzing this term in the book, the author will also discuss the method used by the biologists, especially Darwin.  

Key Words: diversity-orderly structure; naming; typology; comparison; originality

（责任编辑：邢朝国）